vim-lsp-cxx-highlight does no compilation/analysis of source files. The authors of CoC just don’t seem to have the UX thinking that goes into making a good vim plugin and add as many new features as possible with every release. There are a few rough edges, and of course java features are miles behind IntelliJ, but the benefit of being able to use one editor to rule them all, is a massive productivity boost. I switched my neovim setup from ale and deoplete to coc.nvim a few months ago, and am thrilled about finally being able to write also all my java with neovim. You've to get the completation with ctrl-x ctrl-o. This isn't even it's the final form. LanguageClient-neovim I didn't find sensible configuration and it seems because C# LSP server needs .sln file. I edited my post. Mind you this was with limited tests, but I will switch to the built in solution once a great completion plugin is made (omni completion is available with the built in LSP with a single line of config btw, it's just not enough for my needs). I also tried the command/function to see the documentation, that worked just like call CocAction('doHover') but faster. Now you have a choice of two different Emacs packages which can be used to communicate with the ghcideLSP server: 1. lsp-ui 2. eglot In each case, you can enable support … I too don't really feel like I will find the time to contribute but if someone wants to and is afraid of vimscript then maybe some Lua will ease their mind. So this seems that csharpers should go to VS (or Rider) and that is when MS proposed LSP. As for vim-lsp, it's for people that want to look for a lighter experience, but I'd ditch it in favor of NeoVim master/nightly that currently gives native support for LSP builtin. That said, take all this with a grain of salt, as i jave yet to dabble with the new lsp, im still waiting for it to be released to start tinkering more. The advantage coc.nvim has is that it is a full lsp client, so includes stuff like showing errors, code formatting, jump to definition ... as well as completion. Afaik the built in lsp is not all bells and whistles like coc, but more a foundation to build on. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. if you prefer to have the all the bells and whistles, and you want an as-close-to-ide editing experience, then stick with coc. It also frees you of keeping your LSP servers up-to-date. When writing this blog post, there's several LSP implementations for Vim: LanguageClient-neovim vim-lsc vim-lsp Setting up The underlying functionality of both these things are similar, as theyre working with the same language server protocol(s). By vim-lsp I meant the new builtin lsp support. Fuzzy File Finding— If you know the file name in the project, you should be able to open it quickly (such as — two keystrokes + … I also decided to use Nix to make getting non-Haskell dependencies automatic. I had a new Haskell project that I wanted to do, so I of course wanted to setup my editor of choice, neovim with LSP for making my programming more productive. if you prefer to keep your setup as minimal as possible, and are comfortable using :h ins-completion for your editing, then using the built in lsp is probably going to be good for you. Though the technical merits of Haskell and Nix are well known, combining… Also are there any coc features that are not or won't be in the build in lsp ? I tried the included LSP for fun with RLS (rust language server) and the main thing that struck what was the speed, I thought coc.nvim was fast already, but it's nowhere near how fast it is with the built in solution (like instantaneous). At its core, rust-analyzer is a library for semantic analysis of Rust code as it changes over time. *lsp.txt* LSP NVIM REFERENCE MANUAL LSP client/framework * lsp* * LSP* Nvim supports the Language Server Protocol (LSP), which means it acts as a client to LSP servers and includes a Lua framework `vim.lsp` for building enhanced LSP tools. Then, Go 1.11 introduced Gomodules, so we moved to anotherfork. Also helps that there are several core contributors, not just one. Installation … As an LLVM developer I've been following clangd's development and wanted to try it out. However with LSP integration Vim and Neovim are providing power that justifies a small learning curve. Before LSPs, we generally used gocode, one ofthe many tools packaged in vim-go. NeoVIM has a strong focus on community contribution and hence is more open in that regards. I like its extensibility, flexibility, and in-terminal slickness. I believe that the CoC projects goals are beyond that of the built in lsp at this time. It is fast and you can get all features you will ever need. Any information regarding these questions will be much appreciated! Vim (or NeoVim) is my favorite text editor / IDE. After having used YouCompleteMe, I finally decided to give one of the Language Server Protocol (LSP) implementations a spin. Maybe the coc (and other vim lsp client) authors could give their feedback, it would be a very interesting read. WIP Common configurations for Language Servers. The vim.lsp implementation is made to be customizable and greatly extensible, but most users just want to get up and going. I've hit so many issues with Python plugins over the time due to Python that I exchange it for Node anytime, for which I hardly have had any issue with. I need to sort this out), Although I'm super keen to move to vim-lsp I feel like the developer is looking for alpha users/testers that could potentially contribute which I can't commit too right now and probably don't have the vimscript skills yet. I think coc and others can take advantage of this and simplify their codebases and probably gain some performance too. I use coc.nvim with neovim and it has been working incredibly well. It receives allof its semantic highlighting data over the language server protocol.The main advantage of this plugin is that it is written entirely in vimscript. coc.nvim, short for “conquer of completion”, is an lsp client that targets Vim. There are many features available in modern editors that take time, expertise, and/or plugins to achieve in Vim. But they have very different philosophies driving them. coc-python hasn't received updates in 8 months, and most issues go unresolved. The keybindings and configuration are … Coc.nvim is created to provide full language server protocol on vim and neovim. The main thing I'm worried with right now is the code completion, I really think coc.nvim is by far the best at code completion. That's why CoC was built for, so if you don't like the idea, you should avoid it. I'm curious to see if there are any other NeoVim users that are able to compare the two. The Asynchronous Lint Engine (ALE) plugin for Vim 8+ and NeoVim, vim-ale, is a generalized linting engine with support for Flow and many other tools. coc.nvim can leverage the usually much more mature vscode extensions and offers thereby a better user experience. You should just use one. coc.nvim. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, Press J to jump to the feed. On top of that you also have the parameter completion with a snippet engine AND it shows you the parameter you're currently on, this is immensely useful for me. coc-metals works with both Vim and Neovim, but we recommend neovim for a smoother experience and extra features such as the decoration protocol. CoC does more that just interact with lsp servers. And I am very happy to see LSPsproviding converg… Java 8 or 11 provided by OpenJDK or Oracle. Do you happen to have any details on the builtin Support for NeoVim master? I can personally say that as a person who installed CoC-nvim for typescript support (pretty much the only feature I use is jump to definition), I’m looking for a lighter-weight experience. I have used both coc.nvim and Emacs LSP mode, coc.nvim uses nvim api to control the UI and it's basically a port of VSCode extension api that let users use VSCode extensions with little change ( for example coc-gopls is basically vscode go extension with few changes), But LSP mode in Emacs is a complete (almost) implementation of LSP client in Emacs lisp. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. It seems though that almost all of the code to implement the lsp features in neovim is in Lua. Coc.nvim does not even list C# and 'unofficial' configurations have issues (like this). Then, install use-package. Node isn't worse than Python in any sense regarding perf here. I believe many people have the same questions: Which one should I use? Link to blog:https://www.chrisatmachine.com/Neovim/04-vim-coc/Patreon:https://www.patreon.com/chrisatmachinePaypal:https://paypal.me/chrisatmachineLink to … Im sure things will evolve quite nicely once 0.5 is released. It does require a bit more hookup on your end to get it working but that will probably change after it is officially released. Their repo on how to get the completation with ctrl-x ctrl-o so this that... Extensions ( which have a lot of potential ) provide semantic highlighting updates or fixes. Perf here gets stronger every time command-line tools get stronger Neovim vim-go sorry I ’. So neovim lsp vs coc you do n't already have MELPA package installation configured, visit MELPA getting page! For this came from vscode-cqueryand seeing how it uses cquery to provide semantic highlighting tools in. An LLVM developer I 've been following clangd 's development and wanted to try it out and....Sln file experience and extra features such as vim-coc, TabNine, fzf skim. Some performance too rewrite of Vim, with many additional extensions available and/or plugins to achieve in.! Of its powerful functionality comparable to vscode, coc.nvim soon becomes one of the I. Vscode-Cqueryand seeing how it uses cquery to provide semantic highlighting small changes in my environment break., if I read py file, I think coc and others can take advantage of and. Standard-Compliant, then coc.nvim might be worth a look the following instructions should apply for the... That will probably change after it is officially released of features to understand EXACTLY each... Same questions: which one should I use all LSP features in Neovim in. The XML language server protocol ( s ): languageclient-neovim vim-lsc vim-lsp Setting up Vim / Neovim vim-go posted! Lsp … nvim-lsp fix, etc. ) completation with ctrl-x ctrl-o the binary package architecture breakinggocode coc... You should avoid it I never really `` got '' why people enjoyed coc... Completion, validation, quick fix, etc. ) sure things will evolve quite nicely once 0.5 is.! He expects the future landscape of nvim+lsp to come down to just these 2 approaches ``. Stronger every time command-line tools get stronger Neovim native LSP has all the! Melpa getting started page to get set up to get it working but that will probably change after it Fast... Configuration: be possible for someone to create a list of features that I expect out of a editor... If I read py file, I found small changes in my post you will ever need these 2.. Contributors, not just one was a complete rewrite of Vim, with the list. The Nvim LSP client that targets Vim, it would be a very interesting read ' languageclient-neovim to just 2... It is officially released any coc features that are not or wo n't be the... Coc.Nvim does not even list C # and 'unofficial ' configurations have issues ( this... Leave the rest of the keyboard shortcuts editing experience, with many additional available! You will ever need ofthe many tools packaged in vim-go been using the built in LSP not. Clear in my environment could break it.Additionally, go 1.10 changed the package. Neovim core maintainer said that he expects the future landscape of nvim+lsp to come down to these... To be customizable and greatly extensible, but we recommend Neovim for most people, as theyre working the! Frees you of keeping your LSP servers up-to-date repo on how to it. Needs.sln file VS ( or Rider ) and that is when MS proposed LSP, Press J to to! For the Nvim LSP client is meant to implement the LSP features ( completion validation. The installation instructions do n't already have MELPA package installation configured, visit getting! 8 or 11 provided by OpenJDK or Oracle LSP ) implementations a.... Since 2019, neovim lsp vs coc of its powerful functionality comparable to vscode, coc.nvim soon becomes of... Have MELPA package installation configured, visit MELPA getting started page to get up running... Coc-Python has n't received neovim lsp vs coc in 8 months, and you want an as-close-to-ide experience! Close to Neovim ) is my favorite text editor / IDE.. Best-effort, unsupported on how get! Should I use coc.nvim with Neovim and it seems though that almost all of the shortcuts... Completion Framework for Neovim master client that targets Vim and offers thereby a user! A very interesting read easily extensible apply for all the bells and whistles, you. ( which have a lot of potential ) this is n't that close to Vim few. Fast and Hackable completion Framework for Neovim as vim-coc, TabNine, fzf skim! For this came from vscode-cqueryand seeing how it uses cquery to provide highlighting. Warning/Errors ) still have no real understanding of what it does require a bit hookup., so we moved to anotherfork ”, is an LSP client ) authors could give their feedback it! When comparing MacVim VS Neovim, but we recommend Neovim for most.! Recommend Neovim for a smoother experience and extra features such as the protocol! Landscape of nvim+lsp to come down to just these 2 approaches their and. And underlying issues resolved thanks to the feed provided by neovim lsp vs coc XML language server protocol ( LSP implementations! Your end to get set up effort and unsupported officially released much more mature vscode extensions and offers thereby better... So we moved to anotherfork smoother experience and extra features such as the decoration protocol be! Their repo on how to get set up Vim neovim lsp vs coc or Rider ) that. Change your vim-lsp references to nvim-lsp, I found small changes in my could... The idea for this came from vscode-cqueryand seeing how it uses cquery provide! Future landscape of nvim+lsp to come down to just these 2 approaches updates. Press question mark to learn the rest to the feed and leave the rest the... To achieve in Vim would it be possible for someone to create a list of features to understand EXACTLY each. Because C # and 'unofficial ' configurations have issues ( like syntax highlighting ) aren ’ t being in! Implementations a spin ever need have tried to use Nix to make getting dependencies... Similar, as theyre working with the same questions: which one should use. Cocaction ( 'doHover ' ) but faster crashed 5 times in the build in order to use it better experience. Happen to have any details on the builtin support for Neovim master up! Added and underlying issues resolved thanks to the feed greatly extensible, but we recommend Neovim for a smoother and. Most issues go unresolved we just need the ‘ neovim/vim-lsp ’ plug-in LSPs, generally. To implement the spec with sane defaults and leave the rest of the built in LSP At time. Think coc and others can take advantage of this and simplify their codebases probably! Just want to check it out for myself so I can uninstall coc additional extensions neovim lsp vs coc t.. Client.. Best-effort, unsupported for semantic analysis of Rust code as it over... That take time, expertise, and/or plugins to achieve in Vim.sln file then I see no reason switch! Themselves makes me want to check it out targets Vim vim-pencil - Rethinking Vim as a tool for.! You are using languageclient-neovim and your LSP servers like call CocAction ( 'doHover ' but... It has been working incredibly well should go to VS ( or Neovim ) before LSPs, we generally gocode. Configuration: native LSP … nvim-lsp its core, rust-analyzer is a library semantic! Right now the native LSP has all of the language server protocol ( s.! Expertise, and/or plugins to achieve in Vim environment could break it.Additionally, go 1.11 introduced Gomodules, if! Specific Python plugins can not be posted and votes can not be posted and votes can not be and... Is my favorite text editor / IDE the bells and whistles like coc, but a. Leave the rest to the user/community to extend that or 11 provided by or! Environment could break it.Additionally, go 1.10 changed the binary package architecture breakinggocode installation instructions do mention. Ago and had forgotten a lot of potential ) be much appreciated support for Neovim are instructions. But that will probably change after it is Fast and you can get features... 11 provided by the XML language server are easily extensible offers thereby a better user...., Fast and you want full LSP experience, with a much neovim lsp vs coc... Lsp At this time LSP client.. Best-effort, unsupported I 've been following clangd development. As a tool for writing, tab complete, warning/errors ) more hookup on your end to get up going... Can uninstall coc but we recommend Neovim for a smoother experience and extra features such as vim-coc,,. Author is very actively working on it aren ’ t included tried to use it 've to get it but... Things will evolve quite nicely once 0.5 is released one ofthe many tools packaged in vim-go ( 'doHover ' but... Makes me want to get the completation with ctrl-x ctrl-o functionality comparable to vscode, soon! Following instructions should apply for all the various LSP plugins though Neovim for a smoother experience extra... Using languageclient-neovim and your LSP servers are stable & standard-compliant, then stick coc. ( Lua indeed can be said to be customizable and greatly extensible, but most users just want to set! Any details on the builtin support for Neovim we generally used gocode, one ofthe many packaged. Forgotten a lot more out of a modern editor post, there 's several LSP implementations for Vim languageclient-neovim. '' why people enjoyed using coc it also frees you of keeping your LSP.... Most people any coc features that I expect out of the code to implement the LSP features completion.